spicy books with cartoon covers the tiktok ification of classics

guys we have strayed so far from God because riddle me this how did Jane Austin Books go from looking like this to looking like this in the big old year of 2025 what is going on now listen am no mathematician do words not numbers but something isn't adding up something is not adding up because what is happening no I'm kidding I'm being factious but this week Penguin Books announced these new additions of Austin's Classics and the internet was outraged book Twitter was in uproar it was the 240 character limit equivalent of riots in the street it was crazy having said that book Twitter is always angry about something book Twitter's default setting is furious you say you don't like someone's favorite book they will send you death threat it's it's the wild west out there but with today's video essay did want to talk about it I've been doing lots of research into the cartoonified covers the romance shelf in said bookstore probably looks little something like this it's featureless blob epidemic everyone is featureless blob these days romance books now all seem to look like this but that hasn't always been the case at one point they looked like this then they looked like this and then they looked like this so today we are going to be deep diving into the history of romance book covers and ultimately the reason for their changing designs but firstly definition so pan McMillan defined romance novel as one where the love story is the main plots and points of the book The Real conflict and culmination of the story relates to the relationship and everything else that happens is ultimately serving the central narrative if the central Love Story isn't the main thing at stake then it's not romance guess the point is many many genres will feature love stories in some capacity but in romance genre it is the central dramatic tension of the plot also want to say that I'll be drawing lot of my information in this video from this amazing visual essay from the website pudding it was written by Alice Lang and the article is called what does happily ever after look like so did lot of supplementary research as well but this is something that I'll be referring back to lot of times in this video so will leave the link to this article down below Alice's research documented the way that romance covers have developed and changed over time so we can see that between 2011 and 2023 romance covers became considerably less runchy around 2011 30% of romance covers were considered runchy compared to just 3% in 2023 this correlates with rise in Illustrated covers in 2011 just 7% of covers were Illustrated compared to whopping 72% by 2023 as illustration Rises riness Falls so in order to see and assess how we got here want to rewind all the way back to the beginning of the romance genre and the way it has been both perceived and censored over the years but before we do that wanted to speak little bit about the language of love which to me at least is French and let you know that today's video is very kindly brought to you by lingoda lingoda is language learning website which have personally been using for years they actually do this really cool Sprint challenge which encourages you to focus on your language learning every single day and if you take your classes daily or every second day for 2 months you get 50% cash back or more free classes which is such brilliant incentive to make you actually do it there's also lingoda Flex where you can learn at your own pace on lingoda you can learn French Spanish German business English English and Italian and you can do this through group classes with native level teacher but also you can do onetoone sessions as well personally really love the group classes because you have to really pay attention to what everyone is saying so you get to practice your speaking skills but also your listening skills as well and it made me so much more confident with my friendch actually just got back from trip to Paris and I'm so grateful that did this class because do feel confident when I'm going out to like restaurants or bars Etc or speaking to people to tell them what need in that moment and it feels really nice being able to you know go into supermarket and be able to have an actual conversation with the person who is you know helping you with your bags Etc also after your classes you can look at the class notes and practice in your own time the class times are super flexible honestly this is the perfect way to learn new language so listen there's no time like the present use this as your sign to get started right now and you can even use my discount code using the code 2025 Jack at the link in the description box you can save €20 or the equivalent currency on any language learning course so why not get started today thank you so so much to lingoda for working with me on this video now the origins of the romance novel take us to the late 18th and early 19th century in 1740 Samuel Richardson released novel called Pamela or virtue rewarded in which young woman tries to resist giving her virginity to wealthy land owner it wasn't until little bit later when women started to write novels for other women and the romance genre started to be perceived as feminine urge and ultimately the novel as whole became more associated with women than men this was especially due to the creation of what was called circulating Library circulating libraries basically rented books to people for fee kind of like the Blockbuster of bookstores the result of this of course is that books became more accessible to women and the middle class not just wealthy gentlemen so there's this cartoon right and during my degree saw it for the first time and have never forgotten it it's like seared onto the inside of my eyelids and so went on an absolute Witch Hunt to try and find it and found it tracked it down so this is the cartoon this is courtesy of the women's print history project who notes how the illustration plays into stereotypes about female readers and circulating libraries so you can see that the shelves full of serious books like sermons and histories and voyages and travels are full to the brim whereas the romance shelves have been completely emptied by female readers no The Man Behind them on the ladder he is having to go out of his way to access the highbrow literature whereas the novels are easily accessible think this also implies kind of intellectual snobbery and the kind of mental work that has to go into understanding these books as well as acquiring them so the fact that these books are higher up on the Shelf signifies they are more high brow they're harder to access therefore they are harder to understand the sermons and the world history those books are considered to be the male realm whereas the novels the romance and the down below are for the women notice how the female readers are on the same level as the Sleeping Dog think it implies intellectual laziness simplemindedness the fact that they are closer to an animal whereas the man is elevated above them think the cartoon also suggests abundance and frivolity you can see how the women have books kind of shoved under their arms they're carrying lot of books whereas the man is going for just one the women are also all made up you know they're dressed nicely this one cartoon tells us so much about how novels were perceived at the time the criticisms leveled by the print makers of the circulating library and Beauty in search of knowledge rely on the audience's assumption that women readers didn't have the intellectual fortitude to select virtuous reading materials and might through their poor choices fall prey to frivolity or even immorality the library's role in increasing access to literature for middle-class women raised concerns that this access would corrupt unformed Minds with immoral material that women readers weren't educated to recognize and weren't prepared to resist intellectual and social Elites worried about the degradation of morality virtue and taste if the production and consumption of literature got into the wrong hands and by the wrong hands they mean women and people who aren't the upper class and something's just honestly never Chang this kind of reminds me of the moralizing of literature on book talk and on book Twitter I'm sure you've all seen the videos of people talking about how book talk is just porn book talk is just smart book talk is disgusting book talk is just community of porn addicts with superiority complex yes am quoting directly this tendency towards policing what people especially women read has never really gone away okay I'm going to go on little tangent here but remember that there was this one girl on book talk right she was posting reading updates of her reading experience of the book six of crows and she opens the video by saying that she has been reading the book on her Kindle because the physical formatting of the book was too hard to read she is referring to the way that the page is laid out the fact that it has really small margins and that the font size of the text is really really small can we can we talk about something real quick though can just like talk for second why the is this book first of all the writing is so tiny second of all why are the pages so filled with so many words like what the like pages that aren't filled with this many words like literally every page is like like look at this are you kidding me which think we can all agree would make book physically harder to read because the formatting is not optimized for pleasant reading experience if you're having to squint and it feels like all the words are just like smushed onto the page anyway she says in the video there were so many words on the page right people clowned her for this people took this one clip of her saying why are there so many words on the page completely out of context called her dumb said there was rise in anti-intellectualism on the internet when she was just trying to point out that the font size and the spacing were making the book hard for her to read instead people took her words completely out of context and suggested that she was annoyed that book had words in it people called her infuriating when really she was just critiquing font size which think is fair enough don't know this girl but will ride for her no matter what if she has zero fans am dead because just feel like it was such an injustice ultimately she was victim of what have been personally referring to as discourse culture whereby people have started to engage with the discourse without ever engaging in the original source and the algorithm does kind of push this because of course the discourse encourages you know rage bait and loads of Engagement loads of comments of people being like this is ridiculous but did any of those people actually go and watch her original video because it's very clear that she is not referring to the fact that she's annoyed that the book has words in it she's annoyed about the font size and the formatting the reality is that lot of these commentators are getting lot of views getting lot of followers and therefore making money by taking other people's words out of context it happened to me it is so annoying that people do this but they are profiting from Rage this is just one example but see it so much especially on book talk and book Twitter which is why bring it up here ultimately my point is that this kind of moral Panic about what other people are reading has always seemed to prevailed so going back to the 18th and 19th century now the moral Panic back then was actually very interesting because there seemed to be this crisis about how women were reading and how that was going to corrupt Society but actually the records show that just as many men as women were reading as Jan Fergus observes the popular culture of the time may have identified novels and libraries which sold them as strictly feminine businesses but the evidence tells another story in fact the lists of male and female readers of all classes were not as different as many scholars have supposed or as many 18th century moralists alleged evidence from borrowing libraries such as Marshall's library in have actually revealed that male customers like the Prince of Wales and philosophers of the day like Jean Jac rouso all praised the circulating Library as an institution it was not just women who frequented them and benefited from them wonder if it was one of those things where rise in equality where women and lower class people could start to access literature just resulted in paranoia from the previous Elites because they felt threatened often think of that quote that's like when you are accustomed to privilege equality feels like oppression and think that's what was happening here these people were the original Gatekeepers of reading they walked so that book to commentators could run as time has gone on though those statistics have changed considerably so according to the Romance Writers of America who conducted this research nowadays the number of men reading romance novels has reduced down to just 16% and do think that that has been reflected through the ways that romance novels have developed specifically with their covers as the romance genre reached more and more women and became female dominated space naturally Publishers feed into this through their marketing by marketing to women specifically and this is especially important because the romance genre is responsible for quarter of the publishing Market the entire ecosystem of the book industry relies on romance novels selling so they need covers that are going to sell to their target audience now let's return to Alice Lang's research what does happily ever after look like so at first romance novel covers centered their female protagonists throughout the course of the 20th century romance novel covers and the stories within reflected women's place in society in the 50s and 60s when many more women joined the workforce corporate romance and doctor nurse covers were popular at the same time with the rise of commercial travel women appeared in scenes abroad often with highly exoticized supporting characters things then started to change around the 197s and 1980s as Alice says this represents an era of more feminist openness in women's sexual desire challenging Puritan social forces and ju opposing the two in the social eye this led to the dawn of What's called the clinch this gets its name from how male character would be sort of clinching woman close to his very ripped body they are generally scany clad heterosexual Lovers In The Immortal Embrace as the man protects his Damsel in Distress these covers became so homogeneous that they even feature often the exact same model this guy called Fabio and am fascinated by him so allow me to introduce you to Fabio lanzon Fabio lanzon graced the covers of around 400 romance novels in his prime like Taylor Swift works hard but Fabio lanzon worked harder he became so synon us with the genre that he ended up with cameo in the film Zoolander he had his own reality show where he tried to find the next romance cover star called Mr romance he had this flowing hair chest the size of small village in fact book Riot did deep dive into Fabio lanzon and found that the circumference of his chest was 48 in which is 122 CM which is huge that is chest for days for context the approximate amount of time it takes white oak tree to grow to circumference of 48 in 122 cm is 76 years that was the size of Fabio's chest so now you can see why these female characters are clinging to him for dear life apparently having Fabio on the cover of these books gave them 50 to 60% rise in popularity no one man should have all that power Fabio was not aware of your game this is incredible he released an album there was quarterly fan magazine dedicated to him he even released his own romance novels although they were ghost written but this man had an Empire Joanna Lindsay was the genius behind Fabio's meteoric success she was the first person to put Fabio on her book covers and the insane thing is when she died at the age of 67 and news articles came out the press and the media didn't focus on Joanna Lindsay they focused on Fabio's tribute to her they focused on Fabio rather than the death of the actual author so anyway at this time the romance genre started to face increased criticism at one point British Archbishop even claimed that romance novels were directly responsible for an increased divorce rate in the UK divorce babes divorce Scholars condemned romance books for presenting women as passive and weak to the point that the publisher harle Quinn actually started to offer their readers fake book covers to disguise what they were actually reading so you could put it in this fake book cover and nobody has to know this reminds me of how earlier on in the century there was actually court trial about DH Lawrence's book lady chal's lover this book was set to be banned for containing obscenity and basically the judge who was in charge of the case he had to have copy of this book so his wife took hold of this copy and read through it and she circled all of the sexual scenes all of the obscenity and she even made him little bag to put his in so that no one would know what he was reading ultimately the court case was thrown out and Lady Cha's lover is book that you can still read to this day but also you know books containing sexual content in France used to be covered with yellow bags yellow paper in order to hide their true contents history repeats itself this has always been genre that has been accused of corrupting people but the sales of romance has never faltered as technology improved photographs started to replace these kind of oil paintings of Fabio on the covers Fabio's day was no more Fabio time to retire my friend hopefully we'll see Fabio on like I'm celebrity get me out of here or Dancing with the Stars or the traitors or something would like to see that cover art actually became more explicit and realistic and lines started to be blurred between romance and erotica in 2011 and 2012 about third of the covers still had someone who was at least partially unclothed almost always man alone or with clothed lover in many cases covers focused on the couple's physical intimacy rather than the nature of the plot as the decade wore on people wore more by 2019 fewer than 10% of covers featured state of undress and we still had the clinch to an extent but people were clothed and clinched rather than NY NY think this helps to suggest an emotional intimacy as well as physical one but nowadays we're down to less than 3% and actually most covers these days have the characters kind of at different parts of the cover actually not touching so what replaced the riness well we're back to illustrations but instead of kind of detailed oil paintings of ripped men AKA Fabio now Illustrated covers tend to be little bit more ambiguous my theory is so that you can kind of insert yourself or people that you know and maybe fantasize about little bit into the romance books since these blobs don't really look like anyone distinctive you can use your imagination to fill in the gaps and sort of in that way partly design your own story in your imagination instead of their physical attributes or AB attributes people on romance book covers now are defined more by their hobbies and their jobs and their lifestyle so if you think of the cover of Book Lovers for example you can see that these two people are both engaged with literature in Czech and mate you can see that these two people are interested in chess so on and so forth and honestly in world where many women are sexualized in most art forms this does actually feel like way of reclaiming their identities in totally non- objectified way so in 2011 and 2012 there were just seven Illustrated covers of the 169 that made Publishers Weekly lists in these years and through to 2017 most covers remained photorealistic the few that did use illustrations typically focused on an artifact of the plot or an abstract graphic to highlight the title in instead whereas now they are pretty much ubiquitous so what changed between 2017 and 2025 where we've seen the proliferation of illustrated book covers like totally illustrated book covers well Helen hang released book called The Kiss quotient she released it in 2018 and I'd actually really recommend this book it's about neurode Divergent character who wants to have sexual experiences and so she hires male escort and of course they end up falling in love she asked her publisher for fun Illustrated cover to help slip past unconscious bias related to the race of her lead character who is Asian as in the 20th century plot context regained its position on the cover we start to get an Insight of what the book is actually about what these characters do the Illustrated style took over across bookshelves from 18% of covers featuring that style in 2018 to 61% by 2022 now when you go into your local Bookshop you'll probably notice that pretty much every Romance book looks like the Kiss quoti by 2023 72% of titles were Illustrated and the colors teal yellow pink and purple made up the primary shades of romance now listen everyone has opinions on design choices and whether you appreciate this aesthetically is down to Personal Taste personal preference which everyone is entitled to okay that's one thing but wanted to point out the moral issue of this kind of homogeneous book cover design because many of these books do contain highly erotic content but from their covers for example It Happened One Summer you would never know how filthy this book is you know just by looking at it think this harks back to that tradition of covering books of being kind of embarrassed by the sexual content of books but what happens when this falls into the hands of people who were not expecting highly erotic content because the cover didn't give them any indication that this would include that the reality is that it's now impossible to distinguish between young adult fiction and highly erotic adult fiction which is not meant for children because it ultimately just kind of all looks bit the same for instance these books all look identical we have Icebreaker we have desire or defense we have my phony Valentine rival darling and pucking wild desire or defense rival darling and my phony Valentine are not smutty at all whereas Icebreaker and parking Wild are dirty like crazy there are teachers who have shared on Tik Tok that 10-year-olds were coming into school carrying copy of Icebreaker and ostensibly from the outside looking in it looks like book written for teenagers for young people but actually it isn't appropriate for 10-year-old to read at all guess you could easily make the argument here that parents should be keeping an eye on what their children are reading but ultimately this does look like it is written for them and feel like verys parents do not have the time to be reading every single page of book to make sure it's appropriate for their child to read you know we have to think realistically here about what is actually possible so the Washington College review actually conducted some research around this according to Dimitri Kirk the romance genre has always been popular but thanks to social media it is becoming more popular with younger readers he writes romance readers are getting younger 10 years ago the main romance reading group was women aged 35 to 54 to today the main romance reading group is women aged 18 to 54 also states that romance sales grew by 52% from 2021 to 2022 showing social media's influence on the genre but also when you increase your Target demographic to people much much younger naturally you increase your potential Market size so Publishers do profit from doing this and think that's why it kind of becomes little bit dicey because cynically doesn't that kind of incentivize Publishers to hide the sexually explicit content of their books because it means that young people are more likely to buy them or not be stopped from buying them the issue is what happens when books are pushed towards young readers that aren't appropriate for young readers there's great article by Paste Magazine about exactly this the lines between ya and adult fiction have often been vager than expected we had to create the entire new adult category to explore that Lial space between them and the audience crossover is big cartoon covers often feel like way to take advantage of that although the amorphous nature of this trend seems doomed to lead to multiple instances of reader miscommunication and it's tough because would an explicit logo like on album covers prevent this or would that deter anyone from reading them is it kind of like you know when you have to go and buy toilet paper from the supermarket and you have to walk home with like big stacks of toilet paper under your arm don't know why it feels so embarrassing it's like ew that guy shits that guy poos don't know feel like if the romance book was reading had little explicit sign on the corner it would be like ew it's the sex guy with his Sex book like why would feel so embarrassed by that or perhaps there should be spicy ranking on the back of book but then would novels start to look like Nando's menus there was actually one author who colorcoded her books based on the spicy rating so the covers were different colors based on how intense and erotic they were as you go through the shades the the 50 Shades if you will but also at the end of the day does this kind of distill books down to just how smutty they are this kind of reminds me of that tweet or comment or something when white kns by dust dayvi started to go viral this really intense book about yearning and unrequited love from 1848 and the top comment was like how much smut does this contain what's the spice level of Dos like as said we have strayed so far from God it's funny actually mentioning 50 Shades of Gray cuz wonder what 50 Shades would look like if it was published in 2025 would it look something like this one of my favorite YouTubers it's Divia makes incredible videos reimagining book covers and she created this design for Romeo and Juliet in the kind of illustrated book cover design as well as this edition of Of Mice and Men not the tiktock ification of George and Lenny I'll link her videos down below along with all of my other sources that used to research for this video know it sounds like I'm joking here and this does really feel like bit of non-issue to get riled up over but it's actually very interesting moral dilemma think and the more researched it the more fascinating found it so to give an example there's book called The Perfect play which changed its book cover from this to this based on the new trend in Illustrated covers it looks like completely different book it looks like it's aimed at completely different Market an audience but the text is the same obviously have to add here caveat that this isn't new phenomenon in marketing you know take Twilight when there was the huge sensation around Twilight classic books changed their covers to try to appeal to the huge Twilight audience books like The Scarlet Letter and weing Heights changed their covers to be Twilight ified if you will and now these additions look like they were written by Stephanie Meyer it's actually so so interesting and so this brings us to the Jane Austin of it all you know what's crazy is that now because Jane Austin is on the1 note you can buy Jane Austin with Jane Austin that messes with my mind Jane Austin was one of the first really successful female writers and her Works have really stood the test of time you know the humor the narratives they speak to kind of Eternal universal truth and modern audiences have continued to enjoy their work even few years ago hosted Tik Tok book club and one of our picks was persuasion by Jane Austin and we were reading that alongside contemporary romances like honey and spice because it is just as relevant today as it was when Jane Austin first wrote it and an important piece of context here is that Jane Austin's works are now in the public domain so let me briefly explain how that works so book enters the public domain meaning it is no longer copyrighted after either 95 years of publication or 70 years after the author has died so the copyright for Jane Austin has expired recent example of copyright expiring is George Orwell so you may have seen that lot of different Publishers are reissuing George Orwell's books with new cover designs that is because those books are now in the public domain so because Jane Austin's books are in the public domain any Publishers can reissue copies of these books and that is what Puffin did so Puffin is the children's imprint of penguin random house and listen they had canvas subscription and dream and this is what they came up with and like said at the beginning of the video there was little bit of backlash Penguin Books slammed for ticktock ifying Jane Austin with patronizing new covers as people moan that all books look the same now will say think that this became sensationalized because of the new introductions that are included in these books so basically Puffin asked ya authors to write introductions to each of Jane Austin's books and they sound little something like this so this is the forward to persuasion by Alexis Hall who wrote boyfriend material and lady for the Juke Anne and Wentworth are legit freaking soulmates also can't even say it seriously I'm sorry Anne and Wentworth are sorry Anne and Wentworth are legit freaking soulmates also independently of that Wentworth is great then we have Hannah Grace introducing Sense and Sensibility she is the author of breaker as we've been speaking about and Wildfire she says if Elanor were real I'd bet that her favorite Taylor Swift song would be this is me trying like mean they kind of made rod for their own backs here right the choke hold that Taylor Swift lyrics and songs have over ya authors should be studied by science because you could have like bingo sheet and you will take off Taylor Swift reference in ya novel every single time Tessa Bailey who wrote It Happened One Summer and the opair affair she introduces the novel Emma by saying perhaps Emma Woodhouse didn't know who she would end up with but all the romance authors in the house definitely did so on one hand as someone who has studied these books at University something inside me cringes little bit yes that is true but two things can be true at the same time on the other hand also do think that this is very great for access to these books and it can really help people with making these books more approachable but by explaining them in their terms in their vocabulary in the Lexicon that they are acquainted with it can make these books feel less intimidating it can kind of act as map for what to look out for you know how to contextualize these characters in the way that you understand and the reality is that lot of young people fall out of love with Classics and with reading because they are put into an academic setting where they're told you have to write an essay about this which you will be graded on in way that they may never have experienced with you know chart music or popular films and TV so as result books kind of get turned into this purely academic thing that lot of people run away from and they stop identifying themselves as readers so if we can do anything to combat that then we should started making book content because wanted to talk about books in pop culture so that people who didn't consider themselves readers would be able to reacquaint themselves with the passion of reading and the literary world so if these additions of Austin's work do that for people then ultimately suppose that's net positive thing and the reason say this specifically is because there are other editions of Jane Austin's books that you can buy like if you don't want to read those additions if you don't want to have the kind of cartoon covers or you don't want those for wordss in your addition you don't know have to buy them you know recently bought the penguin clothbound classic editions of Jane Austin's works because those spoke more to me so because these books are in the public domain it means that there are many different additions of these books that you can collect that fit your personal taste if you want to different covers can be made to appeal to different readers there is no one cover of this book that is meant to appeal to everyone like brand new book would have so suppose the outrage around this kind of does wreak of intellectual snobbery in way it's way of gatekeeping again that classic book must be clothbound or feature an old oil painting on the cover you know they don't they can look any way you want them to look so ultimately are these new covers really that harmful or are they just increasing the appeal of much loved and celebrated author who we could all learn something from well the other side of the coin think is that worry that this ya style sets the books up for failure because they are not YA books you're not going to see the words freaking legit in Jane Austin you're not going to see her referring to the characters as Taylor Swift's songs if you go in expecting it to read like an Ali Hazelwood book you kind of are being set up for disappointment unfortunately so in that sense is it kind of false marketing that the exterior from the outside it looks like young adult book but actually when you open it up that wasn't Jane Austin's intention don't know don't think there's straightforward answer but do think it's interesting to think about and discuss hence why ended up making this whole diet rant video research about it and will say this is not penguin's first offense they have done this once before as well do think that these covers got away with it little bit more because they're more abstract but they also cartoonified Shakespeare they also re-released Shakespeare's work with young adult audience in mind with the hope of increasing his appeal once again these ones though were met with much warmer reception at the end of the day do think that the point of these covers is to expand the reach of the audience of these books of these Classics and kind of breathe New Life in them based on the current marketing Trends but do think that Publishers have responsibility not to missell or misrepresent their product like you don't want to manipulate people into reading something that ultimately they won't like especially because the romance genre more than any other genre really suffers from this you know Nancy PA who is one of America's well-known Librarians she talked about the romance genre and I'll never forget this quote she said literary fiction is always judged by the best examples of it and romance is always judged by the worst think that's really true so could this effort to flatten the romance genre into something so distinctive and easily noticeable and homogeneous where every book has exactly the same kind of cover design could that ultimately harm the genre do also want to take moment to point out that this is not the only genre that this style of marketing happens in you know if you look at Fantasy Books they are often quite easily identifiable by the ways that their covers are designed or even the titles you know it's like the castle of sorrow and stone the court of Timber and tyrants the road of yellow and brick like it's always the something of something and something and literary fiction too for while was kind of these abstract blobs and face Silhouettes you know this happens across every genre it's not just romance genre specific thing but did think that romance was especially interesting to analyze and talk about in this way especially because the moral dilemmas of this genre around sexually explicit content bring up some fascinating debates so what do you think hope that this video gave you some kind of food for thoughts and an overview of the industry the history of the romance genre and thank you very very much for watching you can follow me over on Instagram on Tik Tok on my second channel on Goodreads letter boxed if you want you know will be anywhere with an internet connection you can of course subscribe to this channel if you're new give this video like if you liked it if you like you know no one's forcing you I'm not holding you at gunpoint if you want to now would be good time leave me comment letting me know what you thought and until next time all the best stay in touch have the most wonderful day love you to the moon and back and I'll see you next time bye-bye