أكاذيب البخاري وحقيقة الأحاديث

Al bukhari, his real name is (Mohammad Eljaafi) He was born in Bukhara in Uzbakistan nearly 200 years after the death of the prophet Muhammad Al bukhari is very normal person, all this glorification you hear about him today Didn’t exist in his time. It’s nothing but reputation that was made years after his death Al bukhari in his time was just like anyone else Some liked him and defended him, others said he’s liar who shouldn’t be trusted - The abilities and super power of Al bukhari - Uncle bukhari talked lot about himself. one thing he said, is that he memorized more than 70,000 Hadiths when he was child You probably can’t imagine such number so let’s put it into perspective His famous book itself (Sahih Al bukhari) is book of 6 volumes 2000 pages, more than 7000 hadiths That means that al bukhari, when he was young He memorized 10 times more than his 2000 pages book 60 volumes, 20,000 pages And if the average page has 450 words, that means 9,000,000 words Not only that, but he said he memorized the names of all of those Narrators their year of birth and death, where they lived, (And the name of your mother, And your father, your brothers, and their wives, your uncles, your aunts, wanna know their jobs, and to which side they sleep on) You may say this could be normal, it might be his person intelligence but let me prove to you why this is lie Needless to say, how, in his childhood, managed to memorize 70,000 hadiths And how did he manage to find all these hadiths in his desert environment But let’s skip this (child) means something from 5 years to 12 years And let’s say he used to listen to 10 hadiths in day And doesn’t have any free time to rest at all That means to just listen to 70,000 hadiths he’ll need 19 years That’s if we imagined that he memorizes any hadith he listens to from the first attempt So let’s imagine that he started memorizing since he was 5 years old That means he will be 24 years old when he finishes How then did he claim to memorize 70,000 hadiths when he’s kid Let’s take it from scientific point of view Actually no one can memorize 70,000 hadiths The human mind can’t memorize all this information at one time 20,000 pages, 9 million words and he’s still child Are you kidding me? Ofcourse, it’s impossible. Unless, he’s having some sort of syndrome Like Autism, or the Acuired savant syndrome Or any other condition that may let the brain isn’t able to forget anything it sees or hears And on the other hand it’ll make his brain not able to function well Bascially he’ll be mentally ill (Your son has Blood Accumulation in the brain) One of the best people in memorizing things is genius record holder Chinese “Chao Lu” (China is beautiful!) He memorized almost 68,000 PI numbers If we would convert the numbers into words to make things little bit clear That means that Al bukhari memorized at least 132 times more than Chao Lu ..when he was child! Fuck, lol This can’t be scientifically true, The human mind memorizes particular things If it’s like that, then your mind would be full very fast, in matter of days because it has limited amount of memory Especially, that everything you’ll see, smell, hear, every step and every move you make Your mind would take it as memory (This is science) - The Story of the Book of “Sahih Al Bukhari” - Al bukhari said when he was 16, he traveled to Mecca with his mom and brother For the Hajj. But they returned and he stayed He said that he stayed in Mecca for 2 years and then traveled to Al madina Then he said he traveled to the whole arabian peninsula, and he traveled to Bachdad, Basra, Koufa, Damascus, Al quds, Egypt, and then to the moon (You’re very funny, uncle) And kept traveling for 16 years. He collected 600,000 hadiths And at the end, he said that 593,000 were lies, and kept only about 7500 as true and authentic And then he wrote His “Sahih Al bukhari” But if you analyzed this, you’ll see how much of fabrication era that was 600,000 hadiths and only 7500 were true?! That means that around 99 % of the hadiths of Muhammad were lies That means, theoretically, that in 100 muslims.. There was only one.. who was honest And this itself is enough to make you doubt that last person Makes you doubt Al bukhari himself ( We all have our lord in this moment ) ( Amen ) Al bukhari said that to make sure hadith isn’t lie, he used to ask few people not just one. and investigate about the truthfulness of the narrator asking his neighbors about him, etc. So that he make sure he's honest in his daily life Al bukhari in his story about how much effort he put to make sure all his hadiths were true Gives you an idea that single hadith can take up to month of investigation But to make it simple for Al Bukhari, we’ll imagine he listens to 1 hadith every hour And it takes him to make sure it’s true or not, not week, or month.. but the same hour And if we said that he sleep, wake up, eat, etc, in like 10 hours And doesn’t have anything to in his life other than writing what other are saying That means he was listening and investigating about the credibility of 14 hadiths daily! So.. 600,000 hadiths total, and 14 hadiths daily. That means it took him 110 years to finish. And he said he finished the book in just 16 years Also, he didn’t just write one book in these years, no, he wrote more than 18 other books All of them are similar in size or even bigger than “Sahih Al Bukhari”! Also, He said he memorized 70,000 when he was child. But after he grew up he memorized 300,000 hadiths.. 100,000 hadiths were identified as (true) the other 200,000 were (weak or not true) Do you remember that number we mentioned earlier, the 9,000,000 words for the 70,000 hadiths? Now this means he memorizes more than 38,000,000 words more than 240 volumes, more than 558 times more than what Chao lu memorized! This can happen in only one case, just to be truthfull In your dreams (I swear you all will go under the dirt, you’ll see hell!) There’s also something else.. Now he said he memorized 100,000 true hadiths, right? How How did he memorize 100,000 true hadiths when he himself said he went everywhere To collect all the true Hadiths, and couldn’t find but 7500 only?! Where did the other 93,000 hadiths go?! Why didn’t he write them in his book, which he named “Sahih al bukhari”? meaning that it collects all the true hadiths - Evidences about the lies of Al Bukhari - The first evidence that says that what’s in this book is lie, Is actually the Quran itself The Quran itself is an evidence of the lies of Al Bukhari Of course! How so?! I’ll tell you.. didn’t you just ask me?! let me finish then The Quran said many times that Muhammad is just normal guy just like anybody else Like, he’s not miracle doer or anything like that There’re so many verses in the Quran in which it speaks about those who didn’t believe Muhammad was prophet Those people kept asking Muhammad to just show them one miracle (Yea, they’re doubting people) But actually Muhammad didn’t have any miracles so, he kept saying that the quran is his miracle The Quran was supposed to be Muhammad’s miracle (This is the last time hear say this, this word drives me crazy, hate it!) The repetition of the verses that say Muhammad isn’t miracle doer, is an evidence that it’s the main thing people kept talking about it The people knew that he was just normal guy But you’ll find the contrary of this in the hadiths especially in Al bukhari’s book In which Muhammad is described as holy, legendary man who do Miracles regularly On one occasion, one of Muhammad's soldiers handled him small goat to eat The man was surprised Muhammad called all soldiers to join him And every time they eat, the food gets more, not less (Think about this for second for god’s sake!) What’s weird about this, Not only because it’s contradicted with the quran But because that story was mentioned in the bible, when Jesus gave people more bread When there was not enough, and the more people eat, the more the bread gets The story was copied exactly from the bible, but instead of Jesus, they put Muhammad (Everyone will die!) (Why do you speak with such tone man?!) (Cuz everyone will eventually die!) On another occasion, one of the companions seriously injured his eye So that it actually hung from its socket, Then Muhammad simply restored it to its place with his hand and it became even better than before Or when he calls down the rain Or when he was talking to trees Or when he was talking to animals If all these stories were actually true, Muhammad wouldn’t have been portrayed in his own holy book as prophet with book alone and no supporting miracles And people wouldn’t have kept asking him about miracle And the Quran itself would have mentioned these miracles mean, let’s think for moment The Quran will tell “Abu lahab” and his wife to fuck off and won’t write the miracles?! What’s the most important? Insulting Abu lahab and his wife, or mentioning Muhammad's miracles So that the incoming generations benefit from it?! What’s the most important? (You don’t leave anything behind, you little boy) Okay, then what about these hadiths, did Al bukhari invent them?! Not necessarily Muhammad was known as man with no miracles to show And this was point against him mean, even when he was there with his own words, personality and wars Many people didn’t follow or believe his story about being prophet Now imagine after he dies! sure no one will follow him That’s why the people who followed him even before the birth of al bukhari Made up such stories about him, to make him greater than he is mean, even in our time, in the age of science, quantum physics and biochemistry People still say about any sheikh or priest that he’s holy man who cure blindness, sick people and call the devil out of “possessed people”, etc And you want the people who used to live in tents to not call the most legendary person to them As holy man who is used to regularly perform miracles (These thoughts aren’t Egyptian, aren’t Egyptian ) - The contradictions between al bukhari and the history - Al bukhari’s book and generally all the other hadiths books When talking about the history of Islam and the prophet They always talk about some city called (Mecca) And that it Was the center of trade markets and worship etc.. When someone hears all this stories about Mecca, he’ll imagine that all the world knew about it (Or am wrong?) (No, you’re right) But of all the historical documents, not single one mentioned mecca, not even once Or any trade markets that happened to be there There’s not even single mention about tripe called Quraysh from the beginning And to shock you even more.. (No, you won’t believe me swear) There’s not single historical document, or an archaeological evidence That says there was war called “Badr, Khaibar, Tabook or Al khandaq” Or any other war that was Attributed to Muhammad Or said that thousands died in it. Anyway, if we wanted to talk about the contradictions between what’s written In the Islamic texts and what’s written in the historical documents, we won’t finish At the same time the Islamic texts say that Muslim rulers conquered Countries by love Real historians said the exact opposite At the same time man called Al Tabari 300 years after Muslims conquered Palestine Says that there’s an “Umarian pact” and that Muslims entered Palestine with hugs and kisses The documents that were written at the same time Muslims conquered Palestine By the hands of historians who lived inside Palestine itself, said the exact opposite Needless to say the that Umarian Pact itself is full of racism Like, Christians are not allowed to build new churches Or fix the churches that were demolished because of the Islamic conquest Or if there’s some Muslim who wanna enter church for no reason (Come here, you.. where you going) Christians, then, have to open the church and give him food and drink Or if some Muslim wanted to take seat, Christians must stand up and let him set Or another story about lying in history, the story of “Abrha Al habashi” Who wanted to demolish the Kaaba by his elephants, so god ,then, prepared his birds and said to them.. He sent some birds to throw stones at him! Sure, any rational person who lives by his mind and evidences, will say that this story is legend There’s no such thing as god ordering birds to drop stones to some people because they're demolishing some building (Enough, enough with the lies) But if you can’t differentiates between what’s true and what’s legendary anymore Then you can just ask yourself simple question Why didn’t god send those birds when the Kaaba was demolished 50 years after the death of Muhammad?! Or when it was demolished again by “Al Hajjaj ibn Yousseff Elthaqafy” 60 years after the death of Muhammed?! Or 300 years after Muhammad's death when the Qarametta entered the Kaaba and slaughtered All the people inside and drop their body’s in the holy well of Zamzam, And stole the black Stone for more than 20 years To the point that no one is actually sure whether what was restored is the true stone Or fake one (Hell no!) Or in 1979 when some Muslims entered the Kaaba and opened the fire on everyone inside Killing 382 people and injuring more than 1000 Or in 1996 when the Kaaba was completely demolished and then rebuilt from scratch And nothing old remained except for the black Stone Which no one can confirm if it’s the true stone or fake one Ask yourself this, why did god sent birds when there’s no historical records confirming the incident But when there’re historians and anything can be documented forever, he sent nothing And the Kaaba was demolished at least 12 times! This Kaaba save your life earnings to go there and cry While you imagine that it was Built by Uncle Adam, was literally built 20 years ago! The house you live in is probably older than the Kaaba (You’ll be charged with trying to overthrow the government Exposing the safety of your country to dangers Threatens the national safety And the punishment for this is death - Is there any Hadiths that are contradicted with each other - And if we wanted to talk about the contradicted hadiths in Al bukhari Then actually if there’s anything that makes this book interesting It’s the amount of contradicts between it’s hadiths Of course! There’re so many hadiths that talk about certain religious practices But are contradicted and different from each other And there’re contradictions in very clear topics like the age of the prophet You do think that he was 63 when he died, right Yea, but actually no one knows Al bukhari once said 60 years old And in another hadith said 63 And in another hadith by “Muslim ibn el Hajjaj” says 65 who's in another hadith says 60 Or the time he stayed in mecca Some hadiths in Bukhari say 10 years Others say 13 years Others by “Muslim” says 15 years And we’re supposed to believe that all these hadiths are true And all the narrators are honest and never lie or make mistake And all these books shouldn’t be doubted (Now, I’m getting confused) Another example of the contradictions, story in “Sahih Al Bukhari” That there was slave the prophet wanted to sleep with in the house of his wife “Oumaima ibn Sharahel” Muhammad said to the slave “Let yourself to me” (The night is ours now) She replied “can queen let herself to some cheap man”? She decribed him as such Then Muhammad wanted to hit her but she replied “May Allah save me from u” (You think was serious?! you! was just joking!) But now someone may come and say how did she say “may Allah save me from u” If Muhammad was supposed to be messenger from Allah himself That’s because the name “Allah” itself in fact is not an Islamic name “Allah” is name of god the early Arabs worshiped even before Muhammad was born Anyway, After she told him that, Muhammad got out of the room Called someone and told him to give her her clothes and make her leave the house (And anyone who can stop me, show me yourself!) What’s contradicted here is that this story is mentioned in Al Bukhari one more time But this time she wasn’t slave in his wife house, but his wife himself The story was repeated twice with two different people, so, logically One of them has to be false, if not both Because if you’re thinking Muslim you should know That there can’t be any rational prophet who will sleep with slave That's if we assumed that there are actually prophets Also, there’re Hadiths in which he was asked what’s the best thing man can do One time he says “to believe in god, then to go to Jihad, then to do the Hajj” And other time he says “to pray at the time of the prayers, then to listen to ur parents” And other time he says “to go to Jihad” mean, either you know what’s the best thing man can do so you say it so that we can follow it Or you don’t, then you just shut ur mouth.. ..Bukhari! (He’s here to tell jokes, mom but he is funny, give him that) - Fabricated Hadiths - Now if you want to know that most of these hadiths are not only contradicted but also fabricated, Let me tell you good story (Hadith) The story goes that long time ago, there was man named “Abdullah Ibn Sallam” Heard lot about man who keeps saying he’s prophet (means muhammed) So he wanted to go see him and make sure, cuz he’s sick of people calling themselves prophets (You always say that, but you all punch of murderers and thugs) So he went to Muhammed and said, “I’ll ask 3 questions, but no one can answer them unless he’s prophet” “Go head”- Muhammed replied He said, “what’s the first signs of doomsday?” “And what’s the first thing people who’ll go to heaven will eat?” “And what makes the child be more like the father or the mother?" So Muhammed waited for moment and then said, “Gibreel just gave me ur answers.. and answered his 3 questions And surely as expected my dears, can imagine what happened then?! Sure, the guy acknowledged the prophecy of muhammed and became Muslim (Sure thing!) But actually, you just need 5 seconds to know that this story is fabricated “why”, you ask me. Well, how did Abdullah know the answers were correct!.. How did he know Unless he himself was prophet! Cuz he himself said no one will know the answers unless he’s prophet! And if we assumed that he didn’t know the answers But became muslim just because Muhammed answered him mean, is he that stupid, to become Muslim just because Muhammed answered him (Why?! Or it’s just because he’s stupid?!) Because these answers could have been wrong all together Cuz there’s no evidence for whether the first answer is true or not And the second one is an imaginary thing And the third answer Muhammed said, If the sperm of the male was more than the ovumes of the female then it’ll look like the father And if it’s the opposite then it’ll look like the mother And that’s just completely nonsense, it’s not scientific at all and wrong The hadith was fabricated, for one single purpose To glorify Muhammed and tell story of his true prophecy to make others believe in him And sure, if we wanted to talk about the nonsense Hadiths then we’ll take forever You’ll find Hadiths that say when someone wakes up he should blow his nose three times For Satan sleeps in the bridge of one’s nose at night Or that God likes sneezing but doesn't like yawning Or when someone gets sick, he should take some black seed, or 7 dates or honey Or if fly got into your plate, you should sink it all and then keep eating Are you all high or somethin All this is just nonsense Cultural traditions and sayings like any sayings that exist in any simple society But were attributed to Muhammad because they wanted him to be the source of all these teachings They wanted to glorify him Just like when they say that he used to sleep with 6 women in one night Or that his sexual power equals 4000 men To the degree that his sperm sometimes appeared on his clothes This is the ordinary Ordinary! Have ever wondered, What's the use of these Hadiths? Like what will get, as person who lives in the world of Elon musk, bill gates and hawking What will get when hear this?! These Hadiths have no purpose except to glorify him Just like when they tell that the miser is the one who hears the name of the prophet and doesn't say "Peace be upon him" or S.A.W They want to glorify him although you don't say anything when hear the name of Allah How about you say S.A.W now? Peace be upon him Say it one more time Peace be upon him Say it one more time As for why these Hadiths are called "True" Al Bukhari and anyone else who wanted to collect Hadiths To make people listen to their Hadiths and dump anything else They said they differentiates between the true Hadiths and the false ones by following those who narrated it That we heard that person hear from that person that he said he heard so-and-so Heard that Muhammed said so or as they call it (Al Sanad) Patricia Crone, Historian and Orientalist Said that after Muhammed's death there were very small amount of Hadiths And there were some attempts by some people to find the source of these hadiths And despite that those people close to the time of the death of Muhammed They couldn't know the chain of narrators till the person who listened to the hadith from Muhammed Despite the short time between them and the time of Muhammed's death They couldn't know the source of these hadiths So, seeing people after them by 200 years And them saying that they have tons of thousands of Hadiths And they know the chain of narrators to the person who listened to the hadith from Muhammed Is the most obvious sign that these hadiths are not true and fabricated - The story of the Hadith - After the death of Muhammad by 100 years no one was interested in collecting what Muhammad said These Hadiths started to appear in the middle of the political conflict between the Umayyads and the abbasids who wanted to throw the Umayyad ruling You seems to understand all this, boy The Umayyads attacked the Abbasids and said they're not following the real Islam Because they don't accept their Umayyad khalifa They used to fabricate Hadiths to show people that what the Abbasids's doing is not real Islam And the abbaside from the other hand?! They too fabricated hadiths to make people hate the Umayyads and to prove that what the umayyads doing is against Islam You didn't tell me that man, why you always surprise me like that! "Muhammed bin shehab el zohri" was someone who was recruited under the Umayyads gov. Under the ruling of "Abdullah bin marawan" said that the emirs forced people to write hadiths Fabricating Hadiths was main factor in the quick spread of the Islamic conquests The muslims rulers invented Hadiths to make people go to war.. mean to "Jihad" And that dying in the war is the best thing ever "Man, if died in the war you'll sleep with virgins" "72 virgins, man.. the prophet said the Shihada is the best thing muslim can do" "It's the shihada.. the Jihad!" All this, to make people go to war Don't wanna meet the heavenly virgins On one occasion on the madina siege by Quraish After Muhammed ordered people to dig trench around the city Muhammed was helping to break rock that was too big for them So he hit 3 times on the rock and every time he hits, lights comes out from it Muhammad then appeared to see the future He told them the first light meant that god will open Yemen for the muslims And the second means he'll open the west countries And the third means the east countries It was fabricated because the rulers wanted to conquer those places There's also similar Hadith, the same story was there except they changed the countries The hadiths were edited for different times and different places It's the Shihada, people This was the beginning of the Hadiths Political purposes But after that, when the Hadiths became more important to the people themselves And people started to care about what Muhammad was doing in his life To the point that they wanted to know by which hand he used to eat And does he stand or sit when he pees Dead people don't need bathroom, Goda It was used to control the people Some rulers fabricated hadiths to kill anyone who doesn't accept the khalifa And that this's against islam And some fabricated hadiths allowing muslim soldiers to take women as slaves from the enemy So that they have sex with them as they please And then hear someone say, "It's sign of the merciful religion of Islam" Instead of killing them, we just rape them And it's not just the Bukhari, it's any book that contains hadiths Because all of them copied from al bukhari For ex. Muslim bin hajjaj who wrote "Sahih Muslim" Said the same story of al bukhari so that people could believe him He said he traveled to the whole Arabian Peninsula, he went to Mecca, Madinah, Basra, Baghdad, Koufa, Egypt, Syria and Palestine Are in hurry?! why are in hurry?! And then collected 300,000 Hadiths and at the end he was left with just 3000 true hadiths He dismissed 297,000 hadiths despite the fact that no one knows exactly how much he did write in his book Some say 3000, others say 4000 Some say 7000, others say 12000 Then what should do?! It feels so complicated, know Jurisprudence, Shariah, Hadith, Matn and the commentaries No, man. i'll just let the sheikhs decide for me whether should trust the books or not The mind can't be tool to determine what's right and what's wrong Because the reason the mind exist Is to know how to apply what's already said right or wrong "What's wrong with stupid bitch?" But trust me it's much simpler than this Complexity exists in all religions Christianity too has some complicated things like, el soksology, patrology, soksopatry But just because something is complicated that means it's useful The Hadiths are built on something that doesn't have any evidence And this is the first thing that should make not trust it at all But if wanted to believe it, know that it's not in favor of your religion Because if you looked at it as good perosn who lives in the 21st century You'll understand that these Hadiths distort the image of Muhammad It contains lot of bloody, unrealistic and sexual stories Killing, murdering, burning, taking slaves, sleeping with women, abnormal sexual lust and homophobia Things that can't be said on normal person not someone who's supposed to be some god's messenger - The purpose of the Hadiths - So, the hadiths weren't written to be historical texts of the Islamic teachings But was need tool for the rulers to be able to rule Without stories about what to do and what not to do, rulers won't be able to control the public Without stories about muhammad killing that or sleeping with this and having sex with slaves Or leave his wife because she didn't wanna sleep with him, or marries child They wouldn't be able to justify these things Because they themselves are doing it, or want to do it Muhammad married Aisha when she's 6 and slept with her when she was 9 Tie anything with "Muhammad did it" and everyone won't dare to say you're wrong Until the standards of the right and wrong collapses in the society And people stop following their minds but follow some ancient books to tell them do this and don't do that And that's the key rulers used to make people believe in the importance of the hadiths It's not important that the hadiths aren't logical or scientifically accurate or bloody The important thing is there're teachings that must follow or you'll be an infidel And here's Hadith that says, "If you're infidel, you should be killed"